So where the coupling is?Įvent sourced aggregates defined in modules (bounded contexts) are using (sometimes too simple) sample application. Into your business process? Coupling hereĪnd that’s the place where the coupling is introduced. Shop? Or it is better to buy access to an existing solution and invest in integrating it Invoicing system? Yeah, I know Amazon might have one, but do you think it isĪ reasonable thing to invest in building custom invoicing system by small e-commerce Is there any e-commerce company that builds its Also, most of them are quite similar.Īt least the non-core ones. & shipping contexts build in their system. Probably a lot of companies have similar ordering, invoicing That system cooperation is what makes the difference. Because noĬontext is an information silo. In invoicing context may be a different concept than the one on ordering context).īut we still need to communicate the business events between contexts. Ordering context could be a DeliveryAddress in the shipping context, and a Customer
Ubiquitous language and with its concepts (you know, a Customer in The idea of bounded context is to have separate modules, with its own
#Bounded contexts how to#
Showing how to use CQRS and Event Sourcing to implement a sample business process. You could see how we’ve used this gem in our On implementing your business logic without friction. You can quickly generate folder structure, add load path and start working Rails generate bounded_context:bounded_context YOUR-BOUNDED-CONTEXT-NAME
0 kommentar(er)
